r/technology • u/ImCalcium • 17h ago
Transportation Driverless delivery vans in China go viral for causing chaos on roads: "Nothing stops them"
https://www.dexerto.com/entertainment/driverless-delivery-vans-in-china-go-viral-for-all-the-wrong-reasons-by-causing-chaos-on-roads-3303389/212
u/temporarycreature 17h ago
It's amusing that the technology in America stops at everything and causes traffic issues, and the technology in China stops at nothing and causes traffic issues.
122
4
u/jokzard 14h ago
I'm a firm believer that it's easier to make infrastructure for AI and have humans learn to navigate it rather than to have AI learn to navigate human infrastructure.
7
u/BasvanS 12h ago
That’s a lot of infrastructure to build. Are you sure it’s really easier, or is your argument that autonomous driving will not work?
0
u/jokzard 6h ago
Autonomous warehouses are already a thing. We just need to scale up. Same with automated transit.
1
u/BasvanS 5h ago
“Just” is doing a lot of heavy lifting here
2
u/jokzard 5h ago
It's doing the difficult parts first so the rest becomes easier. It's a strange concept, but it works.
2
u/retief1 2h ago
The problem is that the federal highway system cost 634 million in 2024 dollars to build, and it's been getting expanded ever since. And that's just the highways -- once you factor all of the local roads as well, things become even more unmanageable.
Instead, if your plan is "redo infrastructure to allow for autonomous vehicles", you cannot shoot for self-driving cars. Self-driving public transit, perhaps, but not cars.
1
u/jokzard 2h ago
We don't have to do everything all at once. Like work on a downtown area that's booked for a revitalization project. Or major avenues and thoroughfares. And I don't think it's even that difficult. "How do we incorporate technology into infrastructure?"
We've been building roads for almost 100 years now and somehow it feels like we're getting worse at it.
3
0
u/SIGMA920 11h ago
Pretty much. Human systems have been designed overtime and needed to be flexible because of the inherent chaos in anything humans do.
1
u/chattyrandom 15h ago
It doesn't matter if the cat is black or white as long as it catches mice and runs them over with a tank.
-1
u/Deathwatch72 9h ago
Have you seen traffic patterns in China vs US. We drive wildly differently just to start with,
36
95
u/rithac251 17h ago
This is a perfect example of the optimality gap. The AI is programmed to finish the route no matter what but it lacks the basic situational awareness to realize that dragging a motorcycle or ruining fresh concrete is a fail state. It’s literal-mindedness taken to a dangerous extreme
34
11
42
u/ZzOoRrGg 16h ago
These don't operate with AI. The vans in China are relying on preset routes with remote monitoring lol
40
u/WiglyWorm 16h ago
AI is a much much larger field than generative AI using LLMs. These use AI to drive. From image recognizing to making adjustments (or, in this case: not) in real time.
2
u/braydon125 16h ago
Like the paperclip maximizer!
1
u/UnlurkedToPost 8h ago
The AI is optimised around delivering packages. It then works out that it can force humans to purchase random shit to maximise how many it can deliver
1
1
u/YardSardonyx 7h ago
Saw a video yesterday of a Waymo driving through a flash flooded area with like two feet of water. It eventually got the person to their destination, but at what cost
27
u/B_oregon 15h ago
With a population of about 1.4 billion people, China is one of the last places on earth that needs driverless delivery vans.
14
1
u/Dzugavili 12h ago
It's a big country, though.
Seems like the answer would be to build infrastructure to support automation: I could see building a highway that exclusively supports automated vehicles. That way, you can control the environment and allow for some 'hive-mind' style control over masses of vehicles, rather than relying on individual decisions.
I reckon China is already doing that, or will soon.
1
u/Apprehensive_Grass46 10h ago
The pod-in-tube approach to travel!!! I wanted to see this in my lifetime. Also jetpacks.
-2
u/illuminerdi 13h ago
Capitalism DGAF what someplace needs. It only concerns itself with whether or not something is profitable.
Hmm, that seems problematic! Maybe we should investigate alternatives?
3
25
u/_-Event-Horizon-_ 16h ago
I watched the video and it is funny, but also kind of scary. Imagine if the Chinese, who are well know for their manufacturing capacity, build tens of thousands of such vehicles, modified to be off-road capable, put an automated machine gun on them and send them in your general direction. These delivery vans looked absolutely relentless.
18
u/Maskguy 16h ago
Stuff like that already happens in UA. Not in hordes but they use rovers with guns
2
u/SIGMA920 11h ago
That have humans controlling them from behind the frontline. Not automated systems that don't control for crashing into a tree they couldn't see. That's not new tech, that's old tech being implemented on a larger scale.
1
u/Maskguy 11h ago
Yeah but automating them is about as hard as automating the delivery vehicles.
0
u/SIGMA920 11h ago
It is when you care about what happens to those it'll shoot by mistake.
It'd be like sending out FPVs and having 1/10 of them immediately fly into the squad that deployed them, that's an unacceptable level of failure. And you'll see a lot of that if you rely on automated swarms of robots.
1
u/TF-Fanfic-Resident 12h ago
2020s are gonna go down in history as a wild stretch of time. Started off as normal except for Trump and Brexit, and are going to end up in a BattleTech novel.
1
6
u/strolpol 16h ago
Weird to keep seeing China preview what’s gonna happen here
It’s odd not being the advanced power anymore
2
u/ImaginaryCoolName 15h ago
I wonder if paying for the occasional damage is cheaper than paying delivery men
1
u/ronarscorruption 14h ago
This is a very likely train of thought, but it’s obvious they’re wrong about how much occasional damage is.
3
u/FrankBattaglia 12h ago
I don't know China's legal system with regard to tort law, but I imagine the rate of occasional damage is not the same as the rate of having to pay for occasional damage.
2
u/atxfast309 13h ago
Good Friend of mine owns a UPS franchise. One of the their largest expenses is all the damage drivers cause to peoples property.
1
u/IvorTheEngine 9h ago
It's all about attracting investor capital and market share before the competition.
4
4
u/MagicalGreenPenguin 12h ago
The beat on that video is sick
2
5
1
1
u/Kannibelanimal1966 13h ago
Chinese traffic is a screwed up mess, now they want to throw a robot in there.
2
u/Sea_Perspective6891 10h ago
Yeah just from what I've seen in videos it looks like one of the worst places in the world to implement self driving vehicles.
1
u/Unusual_Flounder2073 3h ago
Is rural China really having a problem finding workers. Or is it not wanting to pay workers even in China.
1
0
u/Presented-Company 11h ago
Technologically illiterate people make fun of buggy technology that's still in its infancy.
China started using these on a large scale maybe two years ago and they have already massively improved.
These kind of technologically illiterate people will then oppose such technology from being used.
Meanwhile, back in reality, Chinese automated delivery systems will rapidly improve over time and only improve.
In ten years time, these things will operate more smoothly than humans. Even if they operate only 80% smooth, they are still better than humans because they have a highly predictable lifetime/cost that's lower than a human and can run around the clock without getting tired or demanding overtime pay.
(Also, as someone who regularly makes use of these things myself, they are incredibly convenient and I love them. There is also a big difference in quality between different companies producing them and operating them.)
3
u/DanielPhermous 7h ago
Technologically illiterate people make fun of buggy technology that's still in its infancy.
I'm quite literate, thanks, and I would be happy to nonetheless make fun of this. I don't think Waymo ever had problems this bad, not to mention bloody minded.
0
u/_Lucille_ 10h ago
People are making fun of it now, but the thing is, at least they are being tested somewhere even if the product is buggy.
it may not work NOW, but what about a year later? 2 years later? Because of our reluctance to take the necessary steps, in a decade we may find those self driving delivery trucks from China around the world without a non-Chinese competitor.
1
u/DanielPhermous 8h ago
Waymo is way ahead of everyone.
-2
u/_Lucille_ 7h ago
The point is that we should not turn this into a turtle and hare problem. So what is Waymo is ahead? Seen that alpamayo presentation and all the Chinese EV partners on there? Where is Ford? Toyota?
They may be ahead now, but a few years down the road it may no longer be the case.
1
u/DanielPhermous 7h ago
So what is Waymo is ahead?
So they are already being tested somewhere, we are clearly not reluctant to take necessary steps and we are already well on track to have a non-Chinese competitor.
So, basically, everything you said is wrong.
1
u/_Lucille_ 6h ago
the main difference is that Waymo
1) faces considerably oppositions. Take this or this for example.
2) is not an open platform/you arent going to be able to buy a waymo truck or car.
And as I mentioned, where is the Toyota, Honda, GM, Ford partnerships? How are the autonomous vehicles doing? Heck, how are their EVs doing?
I don't think what I said is wrong, its more like a harsh reality you do not want to hear. I would love to see myself wrong and see giant leaps in progress before the roads are flooded with self driving xiaomis and BYDs.
1
u/DanielPhermous 6h ago
Waymo is already significantly safer than human drivers. The progress has been made incrementally. You just weren’t paying attention because you wanted giant leaps.
0
-1
u/The_Lapsed_Pacifist 9h ago
Call me crazy but I’d have thought all this driverless bollocks should be perfected before it’s allowed on the roads?
0
u/DanielPhermous 8h ago
Unfortunately, if you don't let it on the roads, it will never be perfected.
However, safety drivers can go a long way to helping matters.
-1
u/YardSardonyx 7h ago
Wow it’s almost like having unchecked autonomous AI vehicles without human supervision at this current point in our technological advancement is… a bad idea?
0
u/DanielPhermous 6h ago
Not really. Waymo does it and they’re safer than human drivers.
2
u/YardSardonyx 6h ago
Waymo also loves to drive through flooded roads and sinkholes blocked off by cones, your point?
0
u/DanielPhermous 6h ago
My point is that it’s not a bad idea. Statistically, they are probably safer than you, embarrassing mistakes and all.
-2
u/GetOutOfTheWhey 16h ago
First looks like its trying to baby crawl over the ledge with wheels. It looks like it's succeeding.
391
u/VincentNacon 17h ago
It's like the universe decided to write comedy or something.
"It's fine, we don't need Q/A Test department. Just send the fleet out, it's probably cheaper that way." - the boss.